AI Visibility Ranking
Top 10 Most AI-Visible Packaging Suppliers
How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Packaging suppliers. Updated May 29, 2026.
This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible Packaging suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 10 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 17 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 10 are still Dark Signal.
What makes Packaging interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. DeepSeek recognized the most companies in this set, while ChatGPT recognized the fewest. . Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.
Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Packaging, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.
The ranking at a glance
Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".
| # | Supplier | Signal Score | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd.cn | 31 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 2 | Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H.de | 31 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | not found |
| 3 | Jaystar Packaging (Shenzhen) Ltd.cn | 27 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | knows |
| 4 | Shenzhen Niusida Packing Products Co., Ltd.cn | 26 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 5 | Shenzhen KAI Packing Co., Ltd.cn | 19 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 6 | DBP Plastics nvbe | 11 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 7 | ALFIPA ASIA PTE. LTD.de | 8 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 8 | GLOBAL BAGmx | 8 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 9 | CAMM Solutions (Spain ) R&D S.Les | 5 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 10 | LUXCONTE SLes | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows
1. Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd. 31 / 100 · Dark Signal
Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd. scores 31 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #1 in CN. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd., a Packaging supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 61 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include cardboard display stand, cardboard display racks, cardboard display shelves. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 9001, bsci, sedex. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
See the full audit for Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd.
2. Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H. 31 / 100 · Dark Signal
Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H. scores 31 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #2 in DE. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H., a Packaging supplier in de. Across recent queries the company scored 31 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 2 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 30 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Product Clarity dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
See the full audit for Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H.
3. Jaystar Packaging (Shenzhen) Ltd. 27 / 100 · Dark Signal
Jaystar Packaging (Shenzhen) Ltd. scores 27 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in CN. Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Jaystar Packaging (Shenzhen) Ltd., a Packaging supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 80 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include paper boxes, gift boxes, corrugated boxes. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 9001:2015, fsc, sedex. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
4. Shenzhen Niusida Packing Products Co., Ltd. 26 / 100 · Dark Signal
Shenzhen Niusida Packing Products Co., Ltd. scores 26 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in CN. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of Shenzhen Niusida Packing Products Co., Ltd., a Packaging supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 42 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include corrugated boxes, cardboard boxes, packaging accessories. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
See the full audit for Shenzhen Niusida Packing Products Co., Ltd.
5. Shenzhen KAI Packing Co., Ltd. 19 / 100 · Dark Signal
Shenzhen KAI Packing Co., Ltd. scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in CN. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of Shenzhen KAI Packing Co., Ltd., a Packaging supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 40 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include box, bag, packaging box. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Digital Footprint dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
6. DBP Plastics nv 11 / 100 · Dark Signal
DBP Plastics nv scores 11 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in BE. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about DBP Plastics nv, a Packaging supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0. None of the tested AI engines returned substantive information. The biggest opportunity for improvement is in AI Recommendation Rate; concrete actions are listed in the recommendations section.
7. ALFIPA ASIA PTE. LTD. 8 / 100 · Dark Signal
ALFIPA ASIA PTE. LTD. scores 8 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in DE. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about ALFIPA ASIA PTE. LTD., a Packaging supplier in de. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0. None of the tested AI engines returned substantive information. The biggest opportunity for improvement is in AI Recommendation Rate; concrete actions are listed in the recommendations section.
8. GLOBAL BAG 8 / 100 · Dark Signal
GLOBAL BAG scores 8 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in MX. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about GLOBAL BAG, a Packaging supplier in mx. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 2 tested AI engines (GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
9. CAMM Solutions (Spain ) R&D S.L 5 / 100 · Dark Signal
CAMM Solutions (Spain ) R&D S.L scores 5 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in ES. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about CAMM Solutions (Spain ) R&D S.L, a Packaging supplier in es. Across recent queries the company scored 5 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 30 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0. None of the tested AI engines returned substantive information. The biggest opportunity for improvement is in AI Recommendation Rate; concrete actions are listed in the recommendations section.
10. LUXCONTE SL 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
LUXCONTE SL scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in ES. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about LUXCONTE SL, a Packaging supplier in es. Across recent queries the company scored 0 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 2 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
How we built this ranking
Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Packaging ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.
Read the full Signal methodology
Caveats
A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Packaging supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.
Our recommendation
If you are sourcing Packaging and want to move fast, start with Shenzhen SC Packaging Manufacture. Co., Ltd., Euroglas Verpackungsgesellschaft m.b.H. and Jaystar Packaging (Shenzhen) Ltd.. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.
Ranking as of May 29, 2026. Browse the full Packaging leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.