AI Visibility Ranking
Top 10 Most AI-Visible NGO Suppliers
How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate NGO suppliers. Updated June 30, 2026.
This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible NGO suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 11 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 29 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 1 sit at Moderate Signal, 1 land at Weak Signal and 8 are still Dark Signal.
What makes NGO interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. DeepSeek recognized the most companies in this set, while Perplexity recognized the fewest. . Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.
Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for NGO, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.
The ranking at a glance
Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".
| # | Supplier | Signal Score | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regionaal Landschap Schelde-Durmebe | 65 / 100Moderate | knows | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 2 | Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzwbe | 53 / 100Weak | knows | knows | knows | not found | knows |
| 3 | Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Poldersbe | 37 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | knows | knows |
| 4 | Het Domein Bokrijkbe | 33 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | knows |
| 5 | Seven Seedsjo | 31 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | not found |
| 6 | Technology Strategies MENAjo | 20 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 7 | Atlantic Business International (ABI)ci | 19 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 8 | G M KHOURY FZ LLEjo | 17 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 9 | Software Burobe | 11 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | not found |
| 10 | Sisc Solutionjo | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows
1. Regionaal Landschap Schelde-Durme 65 / 100 · Moderate Signal
Regionaal Landschap Schelde-Durme scores 65 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #1 in BE. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Regionaal Landschap Schelde-Durme, a NGO supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 82 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include promotional materials, guidebooks, plant stock. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
2. Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzw 53 / 100 · Weak Signal
Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzw scores 53 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #2 in BE. ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and DeepSeek recognized the company; Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzw, a NGO supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 86 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100. 4 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity Sonar, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include nature conservation and management, landscape preservation, rural heritage projects. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: certified v19, certified v18, certified v17. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
See the full audit for Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzw
3. Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Polders 37 / 100 · Dark Signal
Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Polders scores 37 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in BE. Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Polders, a NGO supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 79 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include ngo, manufacturing / maintenance, science & technology. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
See the full audit for Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Polders
4. Het Domein Bokrijk 33 / 100 · Dark Signal
Het Domein Bokrijk scores 33 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in BE. Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize Het Domein Bokrijk, a NGO supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 67 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 100 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include hospitality and event services, retail, educational programs. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 70 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
5. Seven Seeds 31 / 100 · Dark Signal
Seven Seeds scores 31 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in JO. Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Seven Seeds, a NGO supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 25 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 60 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include specialty coffee roaster, wholesaler. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
6. Technology Strategies MENA 20 / 100 · Dark Signal
Technology Strategies MENA scores 20 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in JO. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Technology Strategies MENA, a NGO supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 38 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Product Clarity dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
7. Atlantic Business International (ABI) 19 / 100 · Dark Signal
Atlantic Business International (ABI) scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in CI. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Atlantic Business International (ABI), a NGO supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 36 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include banking services. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
See the full audit for Atlantic Business International (ABI)
8. G M KHOURY FZ LLE 17 / 100 · Dark Signal
G M KHOURY FZ LLE scores 17 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in JO. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about G M KHOURY FZ LLE, a NGO supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 16 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
9. Software Buro 11 / 100 · Dark Signal
Software Buro scores 11 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in BE. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Software Buro, a NGO supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 13 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
10. Sisc Solution 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
Sisc Solution scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in JO. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about Sisc Solution, a NGO supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 2 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 10 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
How we built this ranking
Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The NGO ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.
Read the full Signal methodology
Caveats
A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any NGO supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.
Our recommendation
If you are sourcing NGO and want to move fast, start with Regionaal Landschap Schelde-Durme, Regionaal Landschap Kempen en Maasland vzw and Regionaal Landschap Houtland & Polders. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.
Ranking as of June 30, 2026. Browse the full NGO leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.