AI Visibility Ranking
Top 10 Most AI-Visible Marketing & Advertising Suppliers
How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Marketing & Advertising suppliers. Updated July 1, 2026.
This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible Marketing & Advertising suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 33 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 49 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 1 reach Strong Signal, 2 sit at Moderate Signal, 3 land at Weak Signal and 4 are still Dark Signal.
What makes Marketing & Advertising interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. ChatGPT recognized the most companies in this set, while Gemini recognized the fewest. Where engines did rate a supplier, ChatGPT tended to give the highest marks. Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.
Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Marketing & Advertising, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.
The ranking at a glance
Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".
| # | Supplier | Signal Score | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WPIC Marketing + Technologiescn | 84 / 100Strong | knows | 7/10 | not found | not found | knows |
| 2 | Jellyfishgb | 78 / 100Moderate | knows | 7/10 | not found | not found | knows |
| 3 | Enventys Partnersus | 76 / 100Moderate | 7/10 | 7/10 | not found | not found | knows |
| 4 | Boathouseus | 55 / 100Weak | knows | not found | not found | knows | knows |
| 5 | Swift Marketing and Distributionus | 46 / 100Weak | not found | not found | knows | not found | not found |
| 6 | Ennovation Brandsus | 40 / 100Weak | not found | not found | knows | not found | not found |
| 7 | AdCentralus | 29 / 100Dark | not found | not found | knows | not found | not found |
| 8 | CreationDose SrlSBit | 27 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | knows |
| 9 | Mnstrfr | 26 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | not found |
| 10 | Abdur rhoman Islamus | 24 / 100Dark | knows | not found | not found | not found | not found |
Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows
1. WPIC Marketing + Technologies 84 / 100 · Strong Signal
WPIC Marketing + Technologies scores 84 out of 100, a Strong Signal, and ranks #1 in CN. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. Claude rated it 7 out of 10 on overall suitability.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of WPIC Marketing + Technologies, a marketing & advertising supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 82 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include market intelligence, digital commerce, marketplace management. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
2. Jellyfish 78 / 100 · Moderate Signal
Jellyfish scores 78 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #2 in GB. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. Claude rated it 7 out of 10 on overall suitability.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Jellyfish, a marketing & advertising supplier in gb. Across recent queries the company scored 85 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 68 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include digital marketing services, paid media, seo. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: google marketing platform partner, google marketing platform certified partner, google premier partner. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
3. Enventys Partners 76 / 100 · Moderate Signal
Enventys Partners scores 76 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #3 in US. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. ChatGPT rated it 7 out of 10 on overall suitability.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Enventys Partners, a Marketing And Advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 84 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include product development, product design, engineering. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
4. Boathouse 55 / 100 · Weak Signal
Boathouse scores 55 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #4 in US. ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Boathouse, a Marketing and Advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 84 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include custom athletic team uniforms, custom team uniforms, outerwear. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
5. Swift Marketing and Distribution 46 / 100 · Weak Signal
Swift Marketing and Distribution scores 46 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #5 in US. Perplexity recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of Swift Marketing and Distribution, a Marketing And Advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 46 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 20 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity Sonar) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include branded corporate wear, promotional products, corporate merchandise. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 30 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
6. Ennovation Brands 40 / 100 · Weak Signal
Ennovation Brands scores 40 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #6 in US. Perplexity recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of Ennovation Brands, a Marketing And Advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 46 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 25 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity Sonar, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include blue ocean products, consumer products, functional. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 30 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
7. AdCentral 29 / 100 · Dark Signal
AdCentral scores 29 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in US. Perplexity recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of AdCentral, a Marketing And Advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 46 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity Sonar) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include digital signage content management, social media scheduling, simple business websites. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 30 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
8. CreationDose SrlSB 27 / 100 · Dark Signal
CreationDose SrlSB scores 27 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in IT. Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize CreationDose SrlSB, a Marketing & Advertising supplier in it. Across recent queries the company scored 69 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 70 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
9. Mnstr 26 / 100 · Dark Signal
Mnstr scores 26 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in FR. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Mnstr, a Marketing and Advertising supplier in fr. Across recent queries the company scored 33 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include digital marketing, content, social media. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
10. Abdur rhoman Islam 24 / 100 · Dark Signal
Abdur rhoman Islam scores 24 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in US. ChatGPT recognized the company; Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Abdur rhoman Islam, a marketing & advertising supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 22 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
How we built this ranking
Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Marketing & Advertising ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.
Read the full Signal methodology
Caveats
A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Marketing & Advertising supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.
Our recommendation
If you are sourcing Marketing & Advertising and want to move fast, start with WPIC Marketing + Technologies, Jellyfish and Enventys Partners. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.
Ranking as of July 1, 2026. Browse the full Marketing & Advertising leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.