ReevolSignal

AI Visibility Ranking

Top 8 Most AI-Visible Healthcare Technology Suppliers

How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Healthcare Technology suppliers. Updated June 29, 2026.

This ranking covers the 8 most AI-visible Healthcare Technology suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 8 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 8, the average score is 17 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 8 are still Dark Signal.

What makes Healthcare Technology interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. Gemini recognized the most companies in this set, while ChatGPT recognized the fewest. . Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.

Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Healthcare Technology, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.

The ranking at a glance

Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".

#SupplierSignal ScoreChatGPTClaudePerplexityGeminiDeepSeek
1UMED Inc.kr39 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundknowsnot found
2Vcare Vision Technology Limitedhk27 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundknowsknows
3Throneus19 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundknowsnot found
4WisMedical Co., Ltd.kr19 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
5SHOSABI incjp13 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
6SARL AXILIOS CDSfr11 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found
7Act with Carebe8 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found
8Vagustimus0 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found

Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows

1. UMED Inc. 39 / 100 · Dark Signal

UMED Inc. scores 39 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #1 in KR. Claude and Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of UMED Inc., a Healthcare Technology supplier in kr. Across recent queries the company scored 81 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include digital x-ray detectors, surgical tables, surgical lights. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 13485, ce. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.

See the full audit for UMED Inc.

2. Vcare Vision Technology Limited 27 / 100 · Dark Signal

Vcare Vision Technology Limited scores 27 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #2 in HK. Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of Vcare Vision Technology Limited, a Healthcare Technology supplier in hk. Across recent queries the company scored 41 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include cctv cameras, ip cameras, camera modules (hd-sdi, cvi/tvi/ahd, ip camera modules). No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Vcare Vision Technology Limited

3. Throne 19 / 100 · Dark Signal

Throne scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in US. Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Throne, a Healthcare Technology supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 28 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include medical imaging, diagnostics, breast imaging. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Throne

4. WisMedical Co., Ltd. 19 / 100 · Dark Signal

WisMedical Co., Ltd. scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in KR. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about WisMedical Co., Ltd., a Healthcare Technology supplier in kr. Across recent queries the company scored 31 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include medical consumables, diagnostic equipment, healthcare products. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 13485, ce marking, fda registration. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for WisMedical Co., Ltd.

5. SHOSABI inc 13 / 100 · Dark Signal

SHOSABI inc scores 13 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in JP. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about SHOSABI inc, a Healthcare Technology supplier in jp. Across recent queries the company scored 16 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 30 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for SHOSABI inc

6. SARL AXILIOS CDS 11 / 100 · Dark Signal

SARL AXILIOS CDS scores 11 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in FR. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about SARL AXILIOS CDS, a Healthcare Technology supplier in fr. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0. None of the tested AI engines returned substantive information. The biggest opportunity for improvement is in AI Recommendation Rate; concrete actions are listed in the recommendations section.

See the full audit for SARL AXILIOS CDS

7. Act with Care 8 / 100 · Dark Signal

Act with Care scores 8 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in BE. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about Act with Care, a Healthcare Technology supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 3 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Act with Care

8. Vagustim 0 / 100 · Dark Signal

Vagustim scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in US. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about Vagustim, a Healthcare Technology supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Vagustim

How we built this ranking

Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Healthcare Technology ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.

Read the full Signal methodology

Caveats

A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Healthcare Technology supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.

Our recommendation

If you are sourcing Healthcare Technology and want to move fast, start with UMED Inc., Vcare Vision Technology Limited and Throne. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.

Ranking as of June 29, 2026. Browse the full Healthcare Technology leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.