ReevolSignal

AI Visibility Ranking

Top 10 Most AI-Visible Fintech Suppliers

How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Fintech suppliers. Updated June 24, 2026.

This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible Fintech suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 11 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 25 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 1 reach Strong Signal, 1 land at Weak Signal and 8 are still Dark Signal.

What makes Fintech interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. DeepSeek recognized the most companies in this set, while ChatGPT recognized the fewest. Where engines did rate a supplier, ChatGPT tended to give the highest marks, and Perplexity was the toughest grader. Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.

Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Fintech, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.

The ranking at a glance

Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".

#SupplierSignal ScoreChatGPTClaudePerplexityGeminiDeepSeek
1Airwallexus84 / 100Strong8/107/10not foundnot found7/10
2Seen Tarbi for Fintechsa44 / 100Weaknot foundnot found6/10not foundnot found
340Seas Buyersus38 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundknowsknows
4Reevolus30 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
5Reevolus21 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
6Reevolus20 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundnot foundknows
7ShenZhen Ster Trading Co., Ltd.cn11 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundnot foundknows
8Reevol companyus0 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found
9Reevolus0 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found
10MIB COLLECTIONScn0 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found

Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows

1. Airwallex 84 / 100 · Strong Signal

Airwallex scores 84 out of 100, a Strong Signal, and ranks #1 in US. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. On overall suitability, ChatGPT rated it highest at 8 out of 10 and Claude lowest at 7 out of 10.

AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Airwallex, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 91 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 68 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include cross-border payment solutions, international money transfers, foreign currency accounts. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: money transmitter license, fincen, asic. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.

See the full audit for Airwallex

2. Seen Tarbi for Fintech 44 / 100 · Weak Signal

Seen Tarbi for Fintech scores 44 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #2 in SA. Perplexity recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. Perplexity rated it 6 out of 10 on overall suitability.

AI engines recognize Seen Tarbi for Fintech, a FinTech supplier in sa. Across recent queries the company scored 65 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 40 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity Sonar, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include open banking / api infrastructure, riyalak personal financial management app, shafafia accounting web application. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: sama open banking / regulatory sandbox. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.

See the full audit for Seen Tarbi for Fintech

3. 40Seas Buyers 38 / 100 · Dark Signal

40Seas Buyers scores 38 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in US. Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines recognize 40Seas Buyers, a fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 73 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include trade finance platform, financing solutions for cross-border b2b trade, embedded payment terms. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 50 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 70 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.

See the full audit for 40Seas Buyers

4. Reevol 30 / 100 · Dark Signal

Reevol scores 30 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in US. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of Reevol, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 52 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 30 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include virtual card issuing, real-time payments, embedded finance. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 27001, soc 2 type ii, pci dss level 1. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Reevol

5. Reevol 21 / 100 · Dark Signal

Reevol scores 21 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in US. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Reevol, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 22 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Reevol

6. Reevol 20 / 100 · Dark Signal

Reevol scores 20 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in US. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Reevol, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 38 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Product Clarity dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Reevol

7. ShenZhen Ster Trading Co., Ltd. 11 / 100 · Dark Signal

ShenZhen Ster Trading Co., Ltd. scores 11 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in CN. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of ShenZhen Ster Trading Co., Ltd., a Fintech supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 46 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 70 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 18 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include pos terminals, payment gateways, kyc solutions. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: pci-dss, iso 27001, financial regulatory licenses. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for ShenZhen Ster Trading Co., Ltd.

8. Reevol company 0 / 100 · Dark Signal

Reevol company scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in US. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about Reevol company, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Reevol company

9. Reevol 0 / 100 · Dark Signal

Reevol scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in US. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about Reevol, a Fintech supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Reevol

10. MIB COLLECTIONS 0 / 100 · Dark Signal

MIB COLLECTIONS scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in CN. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about MIB COLLECTIONS, a Fintech supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for MIB COLLECTIONS

How we built this ranking

Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Fintech ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.

Read the full Signal methodology

Caveats

A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Fintech supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.

Our recommendation

If you are sourcing Fintech and want to move fast, start with Airwallex, Seen Tarbi for Fintech and 40Seas Buyers. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.

Ranking as of June 24, 2026. Browse the full Fintech leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.