ReevolSignal

AI Visibility Ranking

Top 10 Most AI-Visible Environmental Services Suppliers

How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Environmental Services suppliers. Updated June 30, 2026.

This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible Environmental Services suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 13 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 26 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 1 sit at Moderate Signal and 9 are still Dark Signal.

What makes Environmental Services interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. Claude recognized the most companies in this set, while Perplexity recognized the fewest. Where engines did rate a supplier, Claude tended to give the highest marks. Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.

Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Environmental Services, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.

The ranking at a glance

Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".

#SupplierSignal ScoreChatGPTClaudePerplexityGeminiDeepSeek
1Close the Loopau72 / 100Moderateknows7/10not foundnot foundknows
2Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd.cn35 / 100Darkknowsknowsnot foundnot foundnot found
3Green Coversa27 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundknowsnot found
4Shenzhen Tianyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.cn24 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
5Shenzhen Santai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.cn23 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundknowsknows
6Nevofr21 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundnot foundknows
7Copia Resourcesus19 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundnot foundnot found
8Climatsys Science & Technology Co., Ltd.nz19 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundknows
9Taeus16 / 100Darknot foundknowsnot foundnot foundnot found
10Nyo Mar Thantmm0 / 100Darknot foundnot foundnot foundnot foundnot found

Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows

1. Close the Loop 72 / 100 · Moderate Signal

Close the Loop scores 72 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #1 in AU. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. Claude rated it 7 out of 10 on overall suitability.

AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Close the Loop, a environmental services supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 87 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include printing cartridges, cosmetics, other products. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 14001:2015, iso 9001:2015, iso 45001:2018. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.

See the full audit for Close the Loop

2. Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd. 35 / 100 · Dark Signal

Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd. scores 35 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #2 in CN. ChatGPT and Claude recognized the company; Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd., a environmental services supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 59 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 18 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include led lighting products, led drivers, modules. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: ce, rohs, iso 9001. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd.

3. Green Cover 27 / 100 · Dark Signal

Green Cover scores 27 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in SA. Claude and Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of Green Cover, a Environmental Services supplier in sa. Across recent queries the company scored 54 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 70 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 20 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include artificial grass and synthetic turf, playground equipment, safety surfacing. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Green Cover

4. Shenzhen Tianyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. 24 / 100 · Dark Signal

Shenzhen Tianyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. scores 24 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in CN. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Shenzhen Tianyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., a Environmental Services supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 36 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include wastewater treatment, air filtration, solid waste management. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 9001:2015, iso 14001:2015, high-tech enterprise. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Shenzhen Tianyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

5. Shenzhen Santai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. 23 / 100 · Dark Signal

Shenzhen Santai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. scores 23 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in CN. Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have a partial picture of Shenzhen Santai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., a Environmental Services supplier in cn. Across recent queries the company scored 43 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 0 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 70 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Digital Footprint dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Shenzhen Santai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

6. Nevo 21 / 100 · Dark Signal

Nevo scores 21 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in FR. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Nevo, a Environmental Services supplier in fr. Across recent queries the company scored 32 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Nevo

7. Copia Resources 19 / 100 · Dark Signal

Copia Resources scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in US. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Copia Resources, a environmental services supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 19 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Copia Resources

8. Climatsys Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 19 / 100 · Dark Signal

Climatsys Science & Technology Co., Ltd. scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in NZ. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Climatsys Science & Technology Co., Ltd., a Environmental Services supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 21 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 14001, iso 9001. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Climatsys Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

9. Tae 16 / 100 · Dark Signal

Tae scores 16 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in US. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.

AI engines have very limited information about Tae, a environmental services supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 34 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include fusion energy, clean energy, power management. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 14001. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Tae

10. Nyo Mar Thant 0 / 100 · Dark Signal

Nyo Mar Thant scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in MM. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.

AI engines have very limited information about Nyo Mar Thant, a environmental services supplier in mm. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.

See the full audit for Nyo Mar Thant

How we built this ranking

Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Environmental Services ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.

Read the full Signal methodology

Caveats

A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Environmental Services supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.

Our recommendation

If you are sourcing Environmental Services and want to move fast, start with Close the Loop, Shenzhen Ledtech Lighting Co., Ltd. and Green Cover. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.

Ranking as of June 30, 2026. Browse the full Environmental Services leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.