AI Visibility Ranking
Top 10 Most AI-Visible Design Services Suppliers
How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Design Services suppliers. Updated June 4, 2026.
This ranking covers the 10 most AI-visible Design Services suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 10 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 10, the average score is 17 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 10 are still Dark Signal.
What makes Design Services interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. DeepSeek recognized the most companies in this set, while Perplexity recognized the fewest. . Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.
Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Design Services, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.
The ranking at a glance
Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".
| # | Supplier | Signal Score | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OLYMPIC DIAMOND CORPus | 25 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | knows |
| 2 | IDC 1990 Ltdil | 24 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | knows | not found |
| 3 | bm lighting designes | 24 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | knows | not found |
| 4 | Gordon C & Co Ltdhk | 21 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 5 | Lumisys Oy Ltdxx | 20 / 100Dark | knows | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 6 | Refined Motor Company Limitedhk | 20 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 7 | Jan Koon Illustrationhk | 19 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | knows |
| 8 | Omar Munie Clothingnl | 17 / 100Dark | knows | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 9 | Gerrit Schreurs Photographynl | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 10 | Novar Technologiesar | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows
1. OLYMPIC DIAMOND CORP 25 / 100 · Dark Signal
OLYMPIC DIAMOND CORP scores 25 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #1 in US. Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of OLYMPIC DIAMOND CORP, a Design Services supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 46 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 0 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include wholesale diamond and jewelry manufacturing, distribution, retail. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 70 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Digital Footprint dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
2. IDC 1990 Ltd 24 / 100 · Dark Signal
IDC 1990 Ltd scores 24 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #2 in IL. Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have a partial picture of IDC 1990 Ltd, a Design Services supplier in il. Across recent queries the company scored 48 out of 100 (Weak Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 20 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include industrial design, product development. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Buyer Trust dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
3. bm lighting design 24 / 100 · Dark Signal
bm lighting design scores 24 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #3 in ES. Claude and Gemini recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize bm lighting design, a Design Services supplier in es. Across recent queries the company scored 62 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 20 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include architectural lighting design services. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 70 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
4. Gordon C & Co Ltd 21 / 100 · Dark Signal
Gordon C & Co Ltd scores 21 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in HK. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Gordon C & Co Ltd, a Design Services supplier in hk. Across recent queries the company scored 33 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 80 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include product design, engineering, prototyping. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
5. Lumisys Oy Ltd 20 / 100 · Dark Signal
Lumisys Oy Ltd scores 20 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in XX. ChatGPT and DeepSeek recognized the company; Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Lumisys Oy Ltd, a Design Services supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 38 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 20 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Product Clarity dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
6. Refined Motor Company Limited 20 / 100 · Dark Signal
Refined Motor Company Limited scores 20 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in HK. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Refined Motor Company Limited, a Design Services supplier in hk. Across recent queries the company scored 25 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 70 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
7. Jan Koon Illustration 19 / 100 · Dark Signal
Jan Koon Illustration scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in HK. DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Jan Koon Illustration, a Design Services supplier in hk. Across recent queries the company scored 11 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 30 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
8. Omar Munie Clothing 17 / 100 · Dark Signal
Omar Munie Clothing scores 17 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in NL. ChatGPT recognized the company; Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Omar Munie Clothing, a Design Services supplier in nl. Across recent queries the company scored 27 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Product Clarity at 65 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include design services, handbags. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 20 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
9. Gerrit Schreurs Photography 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
Gerrit Schreurs Photography scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in NL. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about Gerrit Schreurs Photography, a Design Services supplier in nl. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
10. Novar Technologies 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
Novar Technologies scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #10 in AR. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about Novar Technologies, a Design Services supplier in ar. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
How we built this ranking
Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Design Services ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.
Read the full Signal methodology
Caveats
A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Design Services supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.
Our recommendation
If you are sourcing Design Services and want to move fast, start with OLYMPIC DIAMOND CORP, IDC 1990 Ltd and bm lighting design. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.
Ranking as of June 4, 2026. Browse the full Design Services leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.