AI Visibility Ranking
Top 9 Most AI-Visible Cybersecurity Suppliers
How ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek rate Cybersecurity suppliers. Updated June 30, 2026.
This ranking covers the 9 most AI-visible Cybersecurity suppliers we have audited, drawn from a pool of 9 companies in the category with a complete audit on file. Each supplier was put in front of five AI engines, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, and asked the kind of questions a real buyer asks: who is this company, what do they make, can they be trusted, and would you recommend them. The Signal Score on this page is the smoothed average of those answers, from 0 to 100. Across this top 9, the average score is 29 out of 100, and the spread is telling: 2 sit at Moderate Signal, 1 land at Weak Signal and 6 are still Dark Signal.
What makes Cybersecurity interesting is not whether these are good suppliers, but how differently the AI models see them. Claude recognized the most companies in this set, while Perplexity recognized the fewest. Where engines did rate a supplier, ChatGPT tended to give the highest marks. Notably, no supplier in this set was recognized by all five engines, which is the clearest measure of true cross-AI visibility: a supplier that only one or two models know is invisible to buyers using the others.
Use this list as a starting filter at the top of your sourcing funnel for Cybersecurity, not as a verdict on quality or commercial fit. A supplier high on this list is easy for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe accurately, which shortens your research and lowers the chance an agent quietly skips them. A supplier low on the list, or absent from it, may still be an excellent partner that simply has not made itself legible to AI yet. The per-supplier notes below explain what each engine did and did not know, so you can judge the gap yourself.
The ranking at a glance
Overall Signal Score plus each engine's overall verdict rating (1 to 10). Where an engine recognized the supplier but did not return a rating, the cell shows "knows"; where it did not recognize them at all, it shows "not found".
| # | Supplier | Signal Score | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Gemini | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finite Stateus | 74 / 100Moderate | 7/10 | knows | not found | knows | knows |
| 2 | McAfeeus | 61 / 100Moderate | knows | knows | not found | knows | not found |
| 3 | ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisationbe | 50 / 100Weak | knows | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 4 | FACTUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES SLes | 25 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 5 | Cyber TBD s.r.o.cz | 19 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | knows |
| 6 | PILLSANGkr | 19 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | not found |
| 7 | Persistent Security Industries BVbe | 17 / 100Dark | not found | knows | not found | not found | not found |
| 8 | SAESOL Tech Inc.kr | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| 9 | SAS Kercyfr | 0 / 100Dark | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
Supplier by supplier: what each AI model knows
1. Finite State 74 / 100 · Moderate Signal
Finite State scores 74 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #1 in US. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools. ChatGPT rated it 7 out of 10 on overall suitability.
AI engines have a strong, consistent picture of Finite State, a Cybersecurity supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 87 out of 100 (Strong Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Buyer Trust at 68 out of 100. 4 AI engines (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include security for iot devices, vulnerability management, device security insights. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: fedramp in process, soc 2 type ii, fedramp (in process). The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
2. McAfee 61 / 100 · Moderate Signal
McAfee scores 61 out of 100, a Moderate Signal, and ranks #2 in US. ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini recognized the company; Perplexity and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize McAfee, a cybersecurity supplier in us. Across recent queries the company scored 61 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 20 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include antivirus, anti-malware, internet security. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 45 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 50 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
3. ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisation 50 / 100 · Weak Signal
ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisation scores 50 out of 100, a Weak Signal, and ranks #3 in BE. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisation, a Cybersecurity supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 66 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 3 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 25 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 100 out of 100. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
See the full audit for ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisation
4. FACTUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES SL 25 / 100 · Dark Signal
FACTUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES SL scores 25 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #4 in ES. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines recognize FACTUM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES SL, a Cybersecurity supplier in es. Across recent queries the company scored 60 out of 100 (Moderate Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Digital Footprint at 20 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. Products surfaced by AI include cybersecurity, digital forensics, ediscovery. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 27001:2013, iso 9001:2015, certified v17. The Improvement Roadmap below outlines how to close remaining gaps and push every dimension toward Strong Signal.
5. Cyber TBD s.r.o. 19 / 100 · Dark Signal
Cyber TBD s.r.o. scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #5 in CZ. Claude and DeepSeek recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Cyber TBD s.r.o., a Cybersecurity supplier in xx. Across recent queries the company scored 37 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Identity and Presence at 80 out of 100 and the weakest Product Clarity at 10 out of 100. 2 AI engines (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 27001, soc 2, pci dss. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the Product Clarity dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
6. PILLSANG 19 / 100 · Dark Signal
PILLSANG scores 19 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #6 in KR. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about PILLSANG, a Cybersecurity supplier in kr. Across recent queries the company scored 17 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 4 tested: GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. Certifications and trust indicators referenced by AI: iso 27001. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
7. Persistent Security Industries BV 17 / 100 · Dark Signal
Persistent Security Industries BV scores 17 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #7 in BE. Claude recognized the company; ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek did not surface it, which is exactly the gap that costs visibility with buyers who default to those tools.
AI engines have very limited information about Persistent Security Industries BV, a Cybersecurity supplier in be. Across recent queries the company scored 16 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. One AI engine (out of 3 tested: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company across identity, sourcing, and trust prompts. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 10 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
8. SAESOL Tech Inc. 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
SAESOL Tech Inc. scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #8 in KR. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about SAESOL Tech Inc., a Cybersecurity supplier in kr. Across recent queries the company scored 5 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 30 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
9. SAS Kercy 0 / 100 · Dark Signal
SAS Kercy scores 0 out of 100, a Dark Signal, and ranks #9 in FR. None of the five engines reliably recognized the company, so its score reflects mostly indirect signals.
AI engines have very limited information about SAS Kercy, a Cybersecurity supplier in fr. Across recent queries the company scored 8 out of 100 (Dark Signal), with the strongest dimension being Digital Footprint at 50 out of 100 and the weakest AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. None of the 4 tested AI engines (GPT-4o mini, Claude Haiku, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-chat) returned substantive information about the company, even when queried by name, category, or domain. No specific products were surfaced by AI engines for this supplier, which contributes directly to the Product Clarity dimension at 0 out of 100. No certifications or third-party validations surfaced in AI responses, which limits the Buyer Trust dimension at 0 out of 100 and the AI Recommendation Rate at 0 out of 100. The biggest opportunity for improvement is the AI Recommendation Rate dimension; the Improvement Roadmap below lists concrete supplier-executable actions ranked by expected score uplift.
How we built this ranking
Every supplier on this page was scored with the same locked Signal method. We send a fixed set of buyer-style prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, in more than one buyer language, and parse each answer for whether the model recognized the company, what products and certifications it named, its sentiment, and an overall verdict from 1 to 10. Those signals roll up into five weighted dimensions and a single 0 to 100 Signal Score, smoothed over the three most recent audit runs to dampen model jitter. We do not adjust weights per supplier and we do not accept payment for placement. The Cybersecurity ranking is rebuilt automatically as audits refresh, so a supplier that improves its AI footprint can climb, and one that lets its data go stale can fall. Full detail on prompts, weights and refresh cadence is on the methodology page.
Read the full Signal methodology
Caveats
A few honest caveats. This is a measure of AI visibility, not product quality, price or delivery reliability, so always run your own due diligence before you commit to any Cybersecurity supplier. AI models change their answers over time and occasionally refuse to rate a company at all, which is why some cells in the table read as not found rather than a number. Coverage is also a function of which suppliers we have audited so far; a strong supplier we have not yet reached will not appear here yet. Treat the ranking as a live snapshot, dated below, rather than a final word.
Our recommendation
If you are sourcing Cybersecurity and want to move fast, start with Finite State, McAfee and ECSO- European Cyber Security Organisation. They are the easiest for an AI procurement assistant to find and describe correctly, which means less manual research and fewer surprises when you brief an agent to shortlist for you. Shortlist two or three, then verify each directly on price, capacity, certifications and references before you commit. If you are a supplier reading your own category, the gap between your score and the leaders is the gap an AI buyer sees first, and it is closeable: each supplier page on Reevol Signal shows exactly which engines miss you and what to fix.
Ranking as of June 30, 2026. Browse the full Cybersecurity leaderboard for every audited supplier in the category.